Bug 1166832 - Remove usage of '!!' idiom.
--- a/dom/media/tests/mochitest/test_peerConnection_multiple_captureStream_canvas_2d.html
+++ b/dom/media/tests/mochitest/test_peerConnection_multiple_captureStream_canvas_2d.html
@@ -47,30 +47,30 @@ runNetworkTest(() => {
test.chain.append([
function FIND_REMOTE_VIDEO() {
// we don't know which remote video is created first, so we don't know
// which corresponds to the original local video (meaning we don't know
// which color is expected in which remote
var testremote = document.getElementById('pcRemote_remote3_video');
ok(!testremote, "Should not have remote3 video element for pcRemote");
testremote = document.getElementById('pcRemote_remote1_video');
- ok(!!testremote, "Should have remote1 video element for pcRemote");
+ ok(testremote, "Should have remote1 video element for pcRemote");
if (h.isPixel(h.getPixel(testremote), h.green, 128)) {
info("testremote has green");
vremote1 = testremote;
vremote2 = document.getElementById('pcRemote_remote2_video');;
} else if (h.isPixel(h.getPixel(testremote), h.blue, 128)) {
info("testremote has blue");
vremote2 = testremote;
vremote1 = document.getElementById('pcRemote_remote2_video');
}
- ok(!!vremote1, "Should have remote1 video element for pcRemote");
- ok(!!vremote2, "Should have remote2 video element for pcRemote");
+ ok(vremote1, "Should have remote1 video element for pcRemote");
+ ok(vremote2, "Should have remote2 video element for pcRemote");
},
function WAIT_FOR_REMOTE1_GREEN() {
return h.waitForPixelColor(vremote1, h.green, 128,
"pcRemote's remote1 should become green");
},
function WAIT_FOR_REMOTE2_BLUE() {
return h.waitForPixelColor(vremote2, h.blue, 128,
"pcRemote's remote2 should become green");